Although ventilation systems consume less energy than space heating or air conditioning equipment, they affect the amount of air that must be heated or cooled in the first place. Therefore, any upgrade that optimizes airflow also leads to heating and cooling savings. Ventilation systems can be classified into constant air volume (CAV) and variable air volume (VAV) systems, and this article will compare both types.
Like in any engineering decision, there are trade-offs when choosing between CAV and VAV ventilation. In general, CAV systems are less expensive and simpler to design and install, while VAV systems offer superior performance and energy savings for a higher upfront cost. In most cases, VAV ventilation is the best option because long-term energy savings far outweigh the additional system cost. However, there are applications where the ventilation load shows little variation, and CAV is recommended because the added features of VAV are rarely used.
Ventilation upgrades can offer an excellent return on investment in New York City. Consider that ventilation equipment normally runs on electricity, and kilowatt-hour prices in NYC are among the highest in the country. Also consider that efficient ventilation helps offset two of the highest energy expenses in buildings: space heating and air conditioning. If you have a deficient ventilation system, consider upgrading it before any improvements to heating and cooling equipment - the savings you can get from a high-efficiency chiller, boiler, or heat pump are limited if the ventilation system is still inefficient. You can also end up with oversized equipment if the ventilation system is not upgraded first.
CAV systems are well-suited for applications where the ventilation load is constant for large periods. Warehouses, call centers, and manufacturing facilities that operate 24/7 are good examples of where CAV can be deployed effectively - these are facilities where the number of occupants and ventilation requirements show almost no variation. CAV ventilation can also be used in concert halls or other event venues that are used sporadically but with a predictable occupancy - the system always operates at rated airflow, but only when the facility is being used.
CAV ventilation systems can be divided into three subtypes:
Regardless of the specific subtype, all CAV ventilation systems suffer from the same limitation: the airflow volume is fixed, and there is no way to reduce it when the full design airflow is not required. The only viable control method is to operate fans intermittently with ON-OFF switches, but this is not energy efficient and causes uncomfortable temperature variations. In addition, CAV systems in general have poor humidity control
Despite the shortcomings of CAV ventilation systems, there are viable applications for them. In general, if ventilation requirements are constant over time, CAV systems can be deployed. VAV ventilation systems cannot save much energy if there are no chances for them to reduce airflow.
VAV systems offer superior performance in any application where ventilation equipment is subject to frequent part-load conditions. This describes the vast majority of commercial spaces, where occupant load is random and constantly changing.
VAV systems should not be confused with demand-controlled ventilation (DCV). While related, the concepts are not equivalent: DCV consists of adjusting ventilation automatically in response to occupancy, while a VAV system allows variable airflow but control can be manual. Demand-controlled ventilation can also be used in CAV systems if airflow is controlled based on occupancy, even if ventilation equipment always operates at 100% capacity when active.
In addition to energy efficiency, a VAV system provides superior control over temperature and humidity. Equipment also lasts longer because it is not subject to frequent switching, like equipment using ON-OFF controls in CAV ventilation systems.
VAV systems depend on two main elements to operate:
VAV boxes open or close the air damper automatically in response to the air temperature of the zone they serve. They are useful when the VAV system serves multiple zones with different HVAC requirements. However, in single-zone systems, a VAV box wastes energy by restricting airflow; in a single-zone system, fan speed controls can provide variable airflow with no need to use a VAV box.
Operating conditions are different from multi-zone systems, where the combination of fan speed controls and VAV boxes achieves the best performance.
In buildings where the ventilation load is variable, VAV systems typically offer energy savings above 30% compared with CAV systems. The best recommendation is to get professional assistance: if you work with qualified design engineers, they can determine the ventilation system configuration that works best in your building, while ensuring it is properly designed.
Make sure your mechanical installations are code-compliant and energy-efficient while getting a 50% faster turnaround. You can contact Nearby EngineersNew York Engineers by email (info@ny-engineers.com) or phone.